Ed Whelan vs. Simon Lazarus: “How Should the Senate Respond to the Nomination of Neil Gorsuch?”

A conservative and a progressive debate what the Senate response to Neil Gorusch should look like. Following Republican refusal to hold a confirmation hearing for Judge Merrick Garland, Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, some Democratic leaders are looking to filibuster Gorsuch’s nomination while only 23 per cent of the Democratic base wants to see Gorsuch confirmed. Additionally, with pervasive concerns about presidential overreach, many are looking for the Senate confirmation process to assess carefully Gorsuch’s qualifications, as well as his independence from the executive office. 
Ed Whelan, the President of the Ethics and Public Policy Center and contributor to the National Review’s “Bench Memos” Blog, argues that Senate Democrats need to figure out how gracefully they want to lose the Gorsuch battle and whether they want to trigger an abolition of the filibuster. 
Simon Lazarus, Senior Counsel at the Constitutional Accountability Center who previously served as Associate Director of Jimmy Carter’s White House Domestic Policy Staff, makes the case for a careful review of Judge Gorsuch with an eye on ensuring he will stand strong for an independent judiciary against the authoritarian inclinations of Donald Trump. 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s